Socrates Scoring Transfer the client's answers from questionnaire (see note below): | ||
Recognition | Ambivalence | Taking Steps |
1 ________ | 2 ________ | 4 ________ |
3 ________ | 5 ________ | |
6 ________ | ||
7 ________ | 8 ________ | |
9 ________ | ||
10 ________ | 11 ________ | |
12 ________ | 13 ________ | |
14 ________ | ||
15 ________ | 16 ________ | |
17 ________ | 18 ________ | |
19 ________ | ||
Totals: Re: ________ | Am: ________ | Ts: ________ |
INSTRUCTIONS: From the SOCRATES Scoring Form (19-Item Version) transfer the total scale scores into the empty boxes at the bottom of the Profile Sheet. Then for each scale, CIRCLE the same value above it to determine the decile range.
DECILE SCORES | Recognition | Ambivalence | Taking Steps |
90 (Very High) | 19-20 | 39-40 | |
80 | 18 | 37-38 | |
70 (High) | 35 | 17 | 36 |
60 | 34 | 16 | 34-35 |
50 (Medium) | 32-33 | 15 | 33 |
40 | 31 | 14 | 31-32 |
30 (Low) | 29-30 | 12-13 | 30 |
20 | 27-28 | 9-11 | 26-29 |
10 (Very Low) | 7-26 | 4-8 | 8-25 |
RAW SCORES (from Scoring Sheet) | Re= | Am= | Ts= |
These interpretive ranges are based on a sample of 1,726 adult men and women presenting for treatment of alcohol problems through Project MATCH. Note that individual scores are therefore being ranked as low, medium, or high relative to people already presenting for alcohol treatment.
Using the SOCRATES Profile Sheet, circle the client's raw score within each of the three scale columns. This provides information as to whether the client's scores are low, average, or high relative to people already seeking treatment for alcohol problems. The following are provided as general guidelines for interpretation of scores, but it is wise in an individual case also to examine individual item responses for additional information.
HIGH scorers directly acknowledge that they are having problems related to their drinking, tending to express a desire for change and to perceive that harm will continue if they do not change.
LOW scorers deny that alcohol is causing them serious problems, reject diagnostic labels such as "problem drinker" and "alcoholic," and do not express a desire for change.
HIGH scorers say that they sometimes wonder if they are in control of their drinking, are drinking too much, are hurting other people, and/or are alcoholic. Thus a high score reflects ambivalence or uncertainty. A high score here reflects some openness to reflection, as might be particularly expected in the contemplation stage of change.
LOW scorers say that they do not wonder whether they drink too much, are in control, are hurting others, or are alcoholic. Note that a person may score low on ambivalence either because he "knows" his drinking is causing problems (high Recognition), or because he "knows" that he does not have drinking problems (low Recognition). Thus a low Ambivalence score should be interpreted in relation to the Recognition score.
HIGH scorers report that they are already doing things to make a positive change in their drinking and may have experienced some success in this regard. Change is under way, and they may want help to persist or to prevent backsliding. A high score on this scale has been found to be predictive of successful change.
LOW scorers report that they are not currently doing things to change their drinking and have not made such changes recently.
No comments:
Post a Comment